Corrections
We fix mistakes in the open
If a profile contains an error or you have better evidence, we want to hear about it. Every accepted correction is published with an audit trail — never quietly edited away.
How the correction process works#
- Submit a request. Tell us which vendor and which field is wrong, what the correct information is, and — most importantly — your evidence. A self-service submission form is coming soon; until then, corrections are accepted through the contact channels listed on this site.
- Review queue. Every request enters a review queue and is acknowledged. Frivolous or evidence-free requests are declined with a reason.
- Evidence check. A researcher independently verifies the claim against primary sources, applying the same source tier standards as our original research.
- Approved observation. If the correction holds up, it becomes a new audited observation on the vendor's profile, superseding the old one.
- Publication. The updated profile goes live and the correction appears in the changes feed so the update is visible, not silent.
- Audit log. The full history — what changed, when, and on what evidence — remains attached to the profile permanently.
What makes a good correction request#
- A link to a primary source (regulatory record, court filing, official registration) beats a screenshot.
- Tell us exactly which field or claim you dispute — vague reports are hard to act on.
- Vendors correcting their own profiles: we welcome it, but vendor-supplied claims are treated as Tier 2 (official but interested) and corroborated independently.